Cofty,
Morality in humans is a function of their higher intelligence. So I rather keep it simple. Intelligent beings are better equipped for survival. It is precisely intelligent individual of a species that improve the chances of survival of the group with higher intelligence. Having said that, my premise doesn't change. Morality is created by the leaders/strong to control the led/weak for the benefit of the whole species, or sometimes for the exclusive benefit of the strong. However, I see a trap. When there are limited or insufficient resources to be shared or adverse conditions appear in the environment, we go back to the primeval form of survival of the fittest. Morality only works when there's abundant resources to be shared. Morality stregthens the group, but weakens the individual. 1000 years ago, many "weak" children would die because they couldn't survive on their own. Today, thanks to advances in the medical field and morality those children have almost 100 % chance of survival. The human race maybe strong and numerous, but the average individual is weaker. I am only stating the facts as I see them; I am not even hinting at eugenics. Morality is so ingrained in me by 48 years of indoctrination that the very idea of using the word makes me feel guilty. Yes, I have become weaker too.